Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ category

Astorino has beaten the odds before

April 8, 2014

It appears the Republicans have picked their candidate to make what might be considered a suicidal run against Andrew Cuomo as he attempts to gain a second term on his way to besting his father’s record of three terms as governor of the Empire State. What’s more, the conventional wisdom is that Andrew sees himself as a future president.

Twice elected Westchester County Executive Rob Astorino has proven that he can garner a lot of votes. He seems to have embraced many of the Tea Party themes that one wouldn’t expect to work in a supposedly liberal state like New York, yet he is extraordinarily popular in Westchester County where Democrats are said to outnumber Republicans two-to-one. How come? The answer: the taxes are high, very high. When the time comes to decide what is first on the priority list of voters, you had better believe that they care a lot about how much they are shelling out for services.

Since he first got to the second floor of that big stone building in Albany, Andrew Cuomo, who is now known as a fiscal conservative-type Democrat, has been preaching the gospel of keeping the cost of government down. His pollster, Drew Zambelli, is one of the best in the business and he knows just how salient taxes are. The more you pay in taxes, the less you can do for your family. So from the moment his run up to yet another term began, Cuomo has stood for a tight, parsimonious government. Astorino has adopted tough Tea Party-type language and basically says it’s all smoke and mirrors and Cuomo is a phony. In this campaign, expect him to point out that New York is right at the top of the list when it comes to the amount it spends on government.

Every once in a while, voters say, “Enough,” and put the brakes on things. Astorino would appear to have found the formula to make that happen in Democratic Westchester. We have seen this kind of thing before in places like New York City and Democratic Massachusetts, where the Democrats, together with their traditional union allies, are seen as driving up taxes and Republicans are elected.

For his part, Astorino is an attractive candidate. He speaks fluent Spanish, which means a great deal to the Hispanic population. He leans toward the Tea Party. He believes in a lean government. To the overtaxed voters of Westchester County, he has appeared as a Godsend. Cuomo has been courting voters an anti-tax conservative, but Republican Astorino has come back with, “Don’t believe him, he’s a phony, it’s all nonsense, and you’re paying through the nose.” What’s more, the Republican establishment seems to be lining up behind him, leaving losers like Donald Trump and Carl Paladino out in the cold. None of this can be good news for Cuomo.

Of course, Cuomo has over thirty million dollars in his campaign account. He is backed by some of the most influential and important money people in the state. He’s a Democrat in an overwhelmingly Democratic state. He is thirty points ahead in the polls. He has that magic family name which won his very popular father, Mario, office three times. But even Mario eventually ran out of steam and lost.

Right now, nobody knows Astorino but they will. If Andrew is seen as buying the election, he could have trouble. Right now, Astorino’s run does seem like a suicide mission but he is the county executive in an overwhelming Democratic County. Just how do you think that happened?

Originally published in the Legislative Gazette, 4/7/14

A cold, dead hand is still dead

April 7, 2014

Some Americans really love their guns. In order to understand what is happening in this country, it is necessary to comprehend the salience of the gun issue to those who insist it is their right to keep and bear arms. You have to try to get inside their heads — their way of thinking. Those in favor of gun ownership believe that there is safety in guns. If someone comes to their house and threatens them, they will be prepared. If someone attempts to rob them in the street, they will have a gun. If someone threatens to do bodily harm to a member of their family, they will be able to protect their loved one. Guns are recreational and can offer a way to unwind. Guns stand between individuals and their government who would harm them. Guns are constitutional, backed up by the most important set of rules we have and affirmed by the Supreme Court. As I have often said, if you put a lie detector cuff on the arm of a passionate gun owner and asked him whether he believed all the arguments that appear above, he would say “yes.” In most, but not all their cases, these folks truly believe what I have written.

No matter how many polls show that Americans think that there are too many guns on our streets, the gun rights folks really don’t believe in them. In the awful, senseless shooting that recently occurred at Fort Hood, some gun supporters will tell you that the problem was not too many guns but too few. They argue that if more people were carrying weapons, the moment a deranged man started firing, someone else would fire back and take him out. The concept of taking guns away from the population is perceived as patent nonsense; namby-pamby garbage that only misguided, silly people believe in. States like Florida that allow overzealous, sometimes racist people to “stand their ground” against a perceived threat are part of our jurisprudence.

Take the case of a child who, thinking a gun is a toy, injures or kills himself or a friend. I can say there are just too many guns and you might argue that the gun should have been under lock and key and the real guilty parties are the parents who didn’t see to it that the guns were stored away. We may argue that we don’t need assault rifles, and the gun enthusiasts respond that if guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.

It is terribly important to remember that the people who own guns really believe in what they are saying. You can intellectualize and argue with them and tell them they are wrong until doomsday and they will think that you are misguided and dangerous. While polls show that Americans want gun control, always try to remember that most Americans have other concerns that are at least as important to them as guns. Many, if not most, gun owners will see this issue as number one on their political priority list. They will rally in front of state capitols; they will run to the polls and vote for or against a candidate on this number one issue. While no one wants to admit it, guns are part of the ideological fabric that makes up the great conservative wing of thought in this country. To the gun control folks, all that stands between them and chaos is their weapon.

When we get politicians like Andrew Cuomo on this issue, they become public enemies to the Second Amendment folks. No matter how many tragedies we witness, how many children we bury, and how many communities are destroyed, the gun lobby has a mindset that will not be changed. It really doesn’t matter what I think. I just find it very dangerous and very sad.

Originally published in the Berkshire Eagle, 4/5/14

 

You can pay me now or pay me later

March 31, 2014

There is nothing more important to a community than its hospital. Running medical institutions well is no easy job. Dave Phelps at Berkshire Health Systems is tough enough to do it right. You sure can’t blame him for not picking up the massive debt from the North Adams debacle. The one thing his board should and will insist upon is fiscal prudence. It’s tempting to look for bad guys in all of this, but there’s really no point engaging in the blame game. Unfortunately, it has already started.

Most of us understand just how devastating the collapse of North Adams Regional Hospital has been for residents of the town. It just takes a few minutes for a heart attack to do its worst and someone in the throes of cardiac arrest should not have to travel for 40 minutes to get to the nearest hospital. We in Great Barrington are fortunate to both have a hospital that services our community with a wide range of medical options and to have worked out a sharing relationship with the mother hospital.

Deval Patrick is an unusual politician. He really cares and he has the intellectual, hands-on capacity to get things done. Clearly, he has been doing whatever he can to make sure that the people of North County have decent health care. Everyone seems to be on board in the effort and when that happens, something positive is bound to occur. Nature certainly does abhor a vacuum and I simply can’t believe that something good won’t come from this. Sometimes you need a crisis to find a solution. In the meantime, I truly feel for all those people who, at least for now, are out of jobs. It’s easy enough for all of us to put ourselves in their places. It’s a catastrophe.

There is a huge push on to bring New York City train service to Berkshire County. Put me at the head of the line that thinks it is a terrific idea. We are a recreational-vacation community and institutions like Tanglewood and Jacob’s Pillow could only benefit from this. The more they benefit, the better off we all are. However, nothing comes without a price. We are talking more and more about high speed rail lines. The faster the trains go, the more likely it is that our Berkshires will become a commuting, bedroom community. So this is a pretty good example of what we might call the law of unanticipated consequences. Remember that we have already priced out many of our young people who just can’t afford to buy locally. The genie is out of the bottle and there is no getting her back in.

Every move forward brings with it new challenges and it is usually better to anticipate them before they arrive than to play catch up later on. The recent explosion of the two buildings in New York City should have us all thinking about the maintenance of our infrastructure. The pipes that carried gas to those two New York buildings were over 60 years old. There are similar explosions waiting to happen all over New York. As the guy on television used to say, “You can pay me now or pay me later.”

When the Great Barrington wise men choose to dig up our sewer pipes to stay ahead of the flow, they knew what they were doing. Very few of us gave them an “attaboy” for their work. Most people don’t want an increase in taxes or wish to see their streets torn up or to be inconvenienced but hey, you really can pay me now or later. Sometimes “later” has some terrible consequences. I remember when the Schoharie Bridge collapsed and people were killed, we started to get serious about our infrastructure. Let’s hope that we don’t have to wait for another tragedy to remember what’s important.

Originally published in the Berkshire Eagle, 3/29/14

 

Gambling is hardly the way to go

March 28, 2014

It would appear that New Yorkers want to gamble. They flock to New Jersey, Connecticut and Massachusetts to seek their fortunes. Some of them use illegal bookmakers to place their bets. They play the lotteries and bet on sports. They spend millions of dollars in the hope of scoring big.

Since politicians don’t like to raise taxes, they are always looking for other ways to raise the necessary revenues to fund the all-too-often bloated state government. Governor Cuomo has advocated bringing gambling casinos to upstate New York. This is a target area for the governor who knows that the upstate economy is in a bad way. So, among other ideas is the awarding of casino licenses to compete with the surrounding states. It would appear that for the governor and others, this is a double win. New York gets to keep the tax money and the upstate economy grows.

Naturally, not everyone thinks this is such a great idea. There are those, for instance, who believe that the government has no business catering to the sometimes addictive gambling behavior of many people who can’t afford to lose the milk money. Others believe that despite the promises of all those jobs, many of the positions will just pay the minimum wage and a lot of the people who staff the casinos will actually be imported. While some people believe the surrounding businesses will benefit, skeptics argue that in other places like Atlantic City, the casinos have not helped other businesses in the area. That’s because the casinos are self-contained operations and people don’t venture outside.

Of course, some people who live in the areas that have been designated for gambling parlors are not happy. Hey, I wouldn’t want one in my neighborhood, in my beautiful small town. You’d have to supplement your police force. You’d need to put more money into your roads and infrastructure, but most of all, the character of your community would change.
I have a theory that the places that will end up adopting the casinos are some of our most at-risk communities. Some of them are already beset with crime. Others will do anything to bring in even marginal employment. Not so for other cities and towns that want nothing to do with gambling.

There is a major fight going on in the beautiful little city of Saratoga Springs. The people there have said they don’t want a casino despite the fact that they already cater to betting with some of the most famous horse racing in the world. Unlike Massachusetts where communities get to vote on whether or not to authorize a casino, New York disgracefully doesn’t allow the people to make that choice. That is not just wrong, it’s undemocratic. In the case of Saratoga Springs, the people voted against the constitutional amendment that authorized casinos. Despite that fact and the clearly expressed opposition to the casinos, there are organized interests that would shove the casino down the unreceptive throats of the citizens there.

Since New York City will have to wait for casinos, some regions as close to the city as possible are putting their gambling oars in the water. The places that most New Yorkers seem to agree would profit most from gambling casinos are the old borscht belt hotels in the Catskills. But even in the once thriving summer communities, there will be groups who oppose the gambling palaces on the basis of morality and character of community issues.

The idea of funding the government through gambling has its limitations. Instead, maybe we should stop spending on things like multiple school districts and politicians’ self-serving projects and raise taxes on the very rich to properly and fairly provide needed services. Gambling is hardly the way to go.

Originally published in the Legislative Gazette, 3/24/14

A poke here, a poke there and dessert

March 24, 2014

I recently completed my annual urology get together with my friend and urologist, Dr. Hugh Fisher. In the course of the visit, we got to talking about an innovation that someone should have thought of and implemented a lot earlier then, well, now.

Many men have at one time or another experienced an elevated PSA reading and/or an inconclusive “digital” examination that has resulted in the inevitable biopsy. In this case, a prostate biopsy involves passing a needle through the skin and into the prostate itself.

Sometimes the urologist takes eight “snips” for biopsy and sometimes 12. Sometimes they work with a kind of anesthesia that dulls the pain and sometimes they do not.

I have been through the process twice.

The problem, unfortunately, is that it can be hit or miss. They stick the needle in a dozen times looking for cancer.

Cancer, of course, can be anywhere in the prostate and if the biopsy needle doesn’t happen to find where the cancer is, they will have a few choices, one of which is to do it again (ouch, ouch) or to abandon the effort. In other words, up to now the examination has been far from perfect.

Now, however, a quantum leap has occurred.

Albany Med is one of the few places that employs Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to assist with the placement of the needle. The process is known as MRI ultrasound fusion biopsy. The urologists and the radiologists have to work together to make this happen and the chances of finding any suspicious bumps or a possible cancer site are now much improved.

It has taken some time to get here but as one who has gone through the process (all was well) twice, I can only say, good stuff.

On a more pleasant subject, there’s a new restaurant at the top of Railroad Street in Great Barrington where Pearls and Fiori used to be. We went to try Mario’s Tuscany Grill and Bar last Saturday night and we couldn’t believe it.

The line was out the door. We soon found out why.

This place is absolutely extraordinary. It’s been advertised as an Italian food place but this is not a pizza joint. The pasta was perfect. The seafood was perfect. The deserts were just as good, the ambiance is pretty much the same as it used to be under previous proprietors.

Mario’s Tuscany Grill prices are moderate, not expensive and not cheap. Our friend Bonnie wanted to eat out on Tuesday night so went back and the food was just as good as it had been the previous Saturday.

The owners of Mario’s Tuscany Grill are brothers, Harry and Sonny Gutic. For 13 years, they’ve run a restaurant of the same name in Winsted, Conn. where they were approached by Steve Picheny, who owns the building here in Great Barrington.

These people are pros. The food came out relatively fast for this kind of restaurant. The wait staff was superb. I asked for a club soda with a hint of cranberry juice and I got just what I asked for. Roselle had a beautiful Chicken Florentine soup (not too salty) and a spinach salad. I had a salmon dish that fit very nicely into my Weight Watchers program.

On Saturday, we shared an incredible dessert called Portufo. It was as good as anything we’ve ever tasted. That did not fit into my Weight Watchers plan. Luckily I had hoarded enough points to get in under the daily wire.

Brother Sonny says he is very happy with the way the new restaurant has been received. He reports great feedback from customers and reminds us that when the weather gets better, there will be outside dining. We are so lucky to have so many great restaurants in Great Barrington.

Originally published in the Berkshire Eagle, 3/24/14

It’s time to allow doctors to help the suffering

March 18, 2014

It takes New York state government a long time before it does the right thing. How come it took so long to even consider a sensible medical marijuana bill that would allow people in great pain and/or the last stages of life to use what is basically a medicinal aid to alleviate their suffering? We know it works. Other states allow it but New York government is old and moribund and filled with people who just say no to everything without thinking things through. We do have some progressive thinkers who are trying to do the right thing, like the chairman of the New York State Assembly Health Committee, Richard Gottfried. Once the youngest member of the Legislature, Gottfried, like Moses, risks being denied entry into the promised land of medical marijuana reform.

Of course, it doesn’t stop there. There is another extension of the relief of suffering concept that is even more demanding — the idea that when someone wants to die with dignity on their own terms, they should be allowed to do so with the assistance of a physician. We all recognize that the end, for some, is filled with pain and the body’s organs are shutting down. Some people are anxious to pass on. Life for them is just so much pain and misery. They want to go and our old-line, conservative forces just are not allowing it to happen. Years ago I talked to a doctor who is himself, long gone. He frankly admitted that there were doctors who had been helping suffering patients to depart for years. The problem, of course, is that in assisting, these heroes put themselves at tremendous risk with the law.

We all know that there are lots of ways to commit suicide. Books like “Final Exit” lay it all out. But our physicians, who are all about alleviation of pain, are not allowed to do what they could do best. Obviously, we can put rules in place to protect those who want to end their lives. You can have more than one doctor signing off. You can have mental health professionals declare that the person seeking ultimate relief knows what he or she is doing. You can refer to end of life signed orders from the patient. You can have the children signing off and, speaking of the children, you might even have a public advocate of some sort ensuring that there is no self-serving motive on the part of any heirs to the estate of the deceased.

Other states like Oregon have passed this legislation and it seems to be working quite well. Frankly, Oregon is a better state than New York. They have more progressive thinkers. They don’t have the same old, same old class of professional politicians who keep on doing it the old way, afraid of religious institutions that may get in the way.

One of the best reasons for sensibly implementing term limits in New York is that we might finally do away with the old pols club. Then our legislators may stop thinking about themselves and start thinking about what is good for the people including those who are suffering and in pain.

Come on now, let’s consider who these politicians are. Many of them are just like you and me. They know what’s right. In their heart of hearts and mind of minds, they know what they would want for themselves or their parents, but they also understand that there are political consequences associated with doing the right thing. That, of course, is what is wrong with our politics. We are populated with self-serving, self-protecting politicians who think of themselves first and the rest of us second. It is as if they were stuck in cement. Just one more reason most of us would vote for term limits. It’s time to move on by allowing doctors to help the suffering.

Originally published in the Legislative Gazette, 3/17/14

West Stockbridge has a tasty trend happening

March 17, 2014

I love the town of West Stockbridge. Like nearby Hudson, N.Y., the little town is reinventing itself before our very eyes.

There is the fabulous eatery, Rouge, which is often crowded and filled with locals and not-so-locals. Then there is the wonderful Public Market where I stop, usually every day. Everyone goes there, including our governor who I hope becomes president some day.

Don McGrory has a great oriental carpet shop. And right next door, Don’s wife, Robin Greeson, has Equator. If you’re lucky, you just might get Don, one of the best musicians around, to play some tunes for you. Just around the corner is Baldwin’s hardware where everyone is treated well and right down from there is the great Hotchkiss Mobiles store.

The latest addition is No. 6 Depot, which we’ve been hearing about but finally got to visit. Roselle and I were blown away. The place has that West Stockbridge spirit. It has a lot of space and serves both breakfast and lunch and Friday dinners and has events like an occasional Tango night.

For the team of Lisa Landry and Flavio Lichtenthal, No. 6 is a natural evolution from all they have done. Flavio is a true coffee maven. He imports beans from all over the world with an eye toward the most ethical standards of the industry.

Unlike so many other coffee people, Flavio roasts the beans himself and mixes them to exacting proportions. Flavio’s parents fled Europe during the second World War as Jewish refugees and ended up in Argentina. Then they moved to New York. He did a year at New Paltz, but then began to ply his career in New York. He started restaurant work at some very famous places in Manhattan and Brooklyn. He and Lisa fell in love with the Berkshires just like so many of us do and Flavio worked in different places, mainly at Gould Farm where he did the cooking. He was there for more than 10 years when he and Lisa started No. 6 Depot.

Flavio met Lisa at a restaurant where he was helping out. She had just returned from Italy where she was a translator. Lisa majored in business, so it is not surprising that the two started to wholesale their coffee to some of the best — and I do mean the best — restaurants in the area and beyond. We are talking about Café Adam, the Prairie Whale and Local 111 to just name a few. The couple has two kids, Sebastian and Paolo, who go to local schools.

Flavio and Lisa are committed to a community dining experience. If they have the time, they get to everyone in the place and make them feel welcome. Their spirit is infectious. When we were there last week, sooner or later everybody seemed to be talking to everyone else.

The food and baked goods are terrific. The service is prompt and hospitable and everyone seems to be smiling. Like Lenox and Great Barrington’s fabulous Haven, you place your order and they bring your meal to your table. Our food was terrific. I had my oatmeal and egg with a ton of fruit on it. The coffee was as good as advertized. Flavio has a 1966 Probat machine which is labor intensive but which he loves. Experts also will recognize his equally labor intensive Victorio Arduino espresso machine. Flavio says that he couldn’t use them in New York but that they are perfect in West Stockbridge, which has less pressure.

Flavio raves about his chef, Juanito, who is famous for his Friday night stews. The only night they serve dinner is Friday and there is almost always a Friday night event like Tango night.

Good things are happening in West Stockbridge. I can guarantee that you will love No. 6. Go, and tell them Alan sent you.

Originally published in the Berkshire Eagle, 3/17/14

Each side needs to give a little to end charter school war

March 11, 2014

The charter school movement in New York was based on the premise that New York’s schools were a mess and there had to be a better way. A few very wealthy folks decided that they could achieve results if they sponsored alternative public schools that didn’t have to adhere to the rules of the other, older public schools. After all, the rich had a choice. They could send their kids to exclusive private schools but poorer folks didn’t have that opportunity. The charterists argued that results were not possible under what they considered to be the mired and moribund educational bureaucracy. That bureaucracy operated under rules that had been developed with a lot of influence by the New York teachers unions, whose job it was to fight for the needs of their members. As a result of these rules, teachers who should have been fired often weren’t because they had tenure. Since most teachers are dedicated and decent people, that made some sense. The unions have always argued that it was possible to fire teachers and there were mechanisms for doing so, but the people running the schools just didn’t follow the rules.

Charter schools have longer hours than the old public schools and have much more freedom to move personnel around. In some, but not all, cases they have achieved better results than some, but not all, public schools. Some charter schools were established by people who were thinking more about themselves than the students they purported to serve. Some of the people heading these organizations are making a lot of money. Sound familiar? As a result, some charters have been closed down by the state authorities monitoring their operations.

When the people of New York City elected Mayor Bill de Blasio, they knew they were choosing a man who had deep reservations about charter schools. He believed, as I do, that you had to reform the schools so that every child was included, not just the few who were lucky enough to win the lottery to get in. He also took great exception to what is called “co-location,” a plan in which charter schools and the older public schools shared the same buildings. Not only do some students fail to gain entrance to charter schools, they have to watch the ones that did parade past them every day. Finally, public schools have to take everyone no matter what stage of emotional and intellectual development. There are charter schools that will not, for example, accept students with disabilities. Traditional public schools have to. Some see this to be “cherry picking” the students who can be successful with less work.

Governor Cuomo has entered the fray telling charter school people that he would use the state to stop the mayor’s plans to reform the charter school process. A few unkind people have actually suggested that Cuomo, who has upward of thirty million dollars in his campaign accounts, was playing to those rich folks who were behind the charter school movement. The blowback from the charterists was so great that de Blasio seems to be taking a few steps backward in his efforts to temper the charter movement.

While there is a war going on over charters it should be remembered that they were formed to set examples for the older schools. In fact, there is now a fierce war that just sets student against student and parent against parent. That’s just wrong. De Blasio has ties to the unions but it sounds to me like his heart is in the right place. On the other hand, to make this all right, each side will have to give a little. Let the old public schools have some of the same easier rules that the charters have and the same incentives to do well. Then maybe the wars will come to an end.

Originally published in the Legislative Gazette, 3/10/14

Not the time for nuclear confrontation

March 10, 2014

The only real thing you have to know about Vladimir Putin is that at heart, he is a KGB colonel. He doesn’t particularly care what you think about him. The only thing that KGB colonels, of the Putin style, care about is power and how to use it. Look, there is no Soviet Union. Theoretically, it’s gone. But is it? Let’s take a look and see.

Russia has always been headed by strong men and women. You can call these people dictators and you can call the people who live in the country “strong man dependent.” Russia has no real history of democracy or balanced government. If Barack Obama wants to do something, he has to get it through two houses of Congress, including a Republican House of Representatives (otherwise known as the “Land of No”). If Putin wants to do something, he does it.

Let’s face it — the last thing the Russians want is to be perceived as a humiliated nation. On the other hand, polling data does not show widespread support for a war over Ukraine. If you could look into Putin’s brain, you would find a man who wants to give Russia a shot in the arm. He needs the support of the people. From that perspective, his moves in Ukraine are perfectly understandable. Nikita Khrushchev gave Crimea back to his native Ukraine but, of course, the Russians were allowed to keep their Black Sea naval facility and had tremendous influence in the whole country. Ukraine was solidly within the “sphere of influence” of the Russians and when it appeared that some in the country wanted closer ties with the European community, the Russians said no. Stalin and his ilk moved a lot of Russians into Ukraine where they now reside. That group feels threatened.

It is pretty well understood that whoever held the seat of power in Ukraine was ethically compromised. Take a look at the last occupant, Victor Yanukovych, who has just been forced from power. The papers that were retrieved as he fled for his life apparently show massive, almost unimaginable corruption. Not only that, many reports show that among the Kiev Ukrainians are people of many stripes, including fascists. Into all of this comes the president of the United States. The Republicans, with their “just say no” to the president, use this, as they have used everything else, to hammer Obama. I keep asking anyone who thinks that he has not been forceful enough what they would do. Do they really think we should get into a confrontation with the nuclear-armed Russians? There may be a time when that is necessary but that time is not now. Some will argue that this kind of territorial push is what happened leading up to World War II. In other words, if Putin is allowed to take territory any time he wishes, we could be looking at another Hitler-like situation.

My bet is that Putin has had enough. When the last so-called Ukrainian revolution took place, the first thing the new and possibly illegal parliament did was to limit the use of the Russian language. Talk about really dumb moves. On the other hand, Putin has an interdependent relationship with the western powers and the last thing he needs is a threat to that relationship. Germany is dependent on Russia for a great deal of its natural gas. While it is true that Germany needs the gas, it is also true that Russia needs the money that pays for the gas.

As it stands now, Putin has pulled back. Whether he stays back is largely up to the group of Western governments. If they say Putin has to be punished and sanctioned, he may feel that he has nothing to lose by exhibiting more aggressive behavior. If they let him off the hook, he ends up with Crimea. Hey, in this world, nothing is easy.

Originally published in the Legislative Gazette, 3/8/14

Leveling the playing field for justice

March 4, 2014

Can you imagine having no money and then being swindled by a businessman or a flat-out crook who takes advantage of your situation? It happens all the time. It may have happened to you. It is easy to yell, “I’ll sue,” but as anyone who has been around the block a few times knows, that legal action doesn’t come cheap. Most people don’t even know how to negotiate the system. That’s one of the reasons why we have a small claims court but even in that case, there can be obstacles and stumbling blocks. You have a much better chance to succeed with legal representation than by going it alone.

Into this scenario comes Eve Schatz, an attorney herself, who is trying to do something to even the playing field so that justice can be accorded to those who can’t afford it. Eve has established The Free Legal Clinic of South Berkshire County, Inc. The idea is to tap into the vast reserve of either practicing or non-practicing lawyers who want to give something back. In that, the organization is much like the wonderful Volunteers in Medicine.

It all began when Schatz, who says she thinks she was born to support the public interest, decided to do something about that commitment. She has always had an interest in fairness and justice. That interest, she says, was born partially in the ‘60s when she saw the Hartford riots and watched hippies being beaten up by police. She saw a society torn apart by the Vietnam war and she recognized the power of the people when they united with one voice. As a result, when she got to law school she directed her efforts toward helping those really in need. Before she went to law school she was a transition program provider at Housatonic Valley Regional High School where she helped students with disabilities.

When she got to the Berkshires, she came to recognize that there were many people here who were unable to pay for legal assistance. When she can, she directs clients to legal aid, but the people who come to The Free Legal Clinic often don’t meet the guidelines for legal aid and fall between the economic cracks.

Schatz says that in the seven years the Free Legal Clinic has been operating, “We’ve helped a thousand clients.” She makes her living as a private attorney doing things like nonprofit law, wills and trusts and real estate law. It is clear that she is passionate about the Free Legal Clinic. But, as every not-for-profit in the Berkshires knows, the day-to-day operations of running an organization is no easy thing to accomplish. You need to rent a space and you need lots of dedicated volunteers. Eve singles out Terrance Cooney, Robin Zeamer, Susan Ketterman and her husband, John Clark. Clark went to law school but never practiced and doesn’t do law but helps in operations. They have made good use of interns including some from Simon’s Rock. Susan Solovay does the marketing for the group.

Schatz says that it costs about a $100,000 a year to run the organization ($90,000 of which comes in the form of “in-kind” donations). This year’s fundraising event will be a “Dance for Justice” combined with a silent auction from 6 to 10 p.m. on March 8 at Dewey Hall in Sheffield. The event will feature comedian T.A. Lewis and the incredible Wanda Houston. The music will be ‘60s, ‘70s and ‘80s. She says that she’d love to find an angel who would help her cover the cost of the event. The goal is to raise $5,000.

Schatz says that she regularly reaches out to the legal community to take on cases and she has never been turned down. She says that they always seem happy to do it.

She really thinks that the Free Legal Clinic has made a difference in the Berkshires.

Originally published in the Berkshire Eagle, 3/1/14


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.