It would appear that New Yorkers want to gamble. They flock to New Jersey, Connecticut and Massachusetts to seek their fortunes. Some of them use illegal bookmakers to place their bets. They play the lotteries and bet on sports. They spend millions of dollars in the hope of scoring big.
Since politicians don’t like to raise taxes, they are always looking for other ways to raise the necessary revenues to fund the all-too-often bloated state government. Governor Cuomo has advocated bringing gambling casinos to upstate New York. This is a target area for the governor who knows that the upstate economy is in a bad way. So, among other ideas is the awarding of casino licenses to compete with the surrounding states. It would appear that for the governor and others, this is a double win. New York gets to keep the tax money and the upstate economy grows.
Naturally, not everyone thinks this is such a great idea. There are those, for instance, who believe that the government has no business catering to the sometimes addictive gambling behavior of many people who can’t afford to lose the milk money. Others believe that despite the promises of all those jobs, many of the positions will just pay the minimum wage and a lot of the people who staff the casinos will actually be imported. While some people believe the surrounding businesses will benefit, skeptics argue that in other places like Atlantic City, the casinos have not helped other businesses in the area. That’s because the casinos are self-contained operations and people don’t venture outside.
Of course, some people who live in the areas that have been designated for gambling parlors are not happy. Hey, I wouldn’t want one in my neighborhood, in my beautiful small town. You’d have to supplement your police force. You’d need to put more money into your roads and infrastructure, but most of all, the character of your community would change.
I have a theory that the places that will end up adopting the casinos are some of our most at-risk communities. Some of them are already beset with crime. Others will do anything to bring in even marginal employment. Not so for other cities and towns that want nothing to do with gambling.
There is a major fight going on in the beautiful little city of Saratoga Springs. The people there have said they don’t want a casino despite the fact that they already cater to betting with some of the most famous horse racing in the world. Unlike Massachusetts where communities get to vote on whether or not to authorize a casino, New York disgracefully doesn’t allow the people to make that choice. That is not just wrong, it’s undemocratic. In the case of Saratoga Springs, the people voted against the constitutional amendment that authorized casinos. Despite that fact and the clearly expressed opposition to the casinos, there are organized interests that would shove the casino down the unreceptive throats of the citizens there.
Since New York City will have to wait for casinos, some regions as close to the city as possible are putting their gambling oars in the water. The places that most New Yorkers seem to agree would profit most from gambling casinos are the old borscht belt hotels in the Catskills. But even in the once thriving summer communities, there will be groups who oppose the gambling palaces on the basis of morality and character of community issues.
The idea of funding the government through gambling has its limitations. Instead, maybe we should stop spending on things like multiple school districts and politicians’ self-serving projects and raise taxes on the very rich to properly and fairly provide needed services. Gambling is hardly the way to go.
Originally published in the Legislative Gazette, 3/24/14